|
Post by Brian Shepard on Dec 1, 2016 20:29:21 GMT -5
We don't really have a solid policy on players who are non-tendered by their teams. Today is the deadline, so I probably should have done this sooner. I am of the belief that these players are different than typical free agents. Their team control has not expired, the team just chooses to not offer them a contract next year. Should an owner here lose a player just because someone like the Dodgers deems that they don't want them back. It doesn't work like that for any other situation with us. I will leave it up to you guys. LMK.
|
|
|
Post by Brian Shepard on Dec 2, 2016 20:45:58 GMT -5
While you can still vote if you'd like, we have more than half that say a non-tendered player remains under previous owner's control. Therefore, that will be our policy. Thanks!
|
|